![]() |
| Boris the Bully |
![]() |
| Tiger the Twit (note bare area near base of tail) |
Phedocia ("Feh doh' shyah") is the name used by a sister of my great grandfather Robert Wolton Meadows. Her full name was Mary Harriet Phedocia Meadows Currah. Why the family took to calling her Phedocia instead of one of her other names is a story lost to history. She was apparently held in high esteem by kinfolk near (Canada) and far (California), and for no particular reason is now immortalized in the new name of my blog.
I subscribe to "Daily Cat Tip" from catster.com, and when I got a tip the other day about house training a cat, I couldn't help but wonder: Why is this so obvious for cats, but seemingly not for kids? I see countless parents failing to heed this very basic and sound advice where their children are concerned. Are they any more likely to apply them to their cats?When it comes to training [teaching] a new cat [a child] the rules of the house [or classroom or society], nothing will undo your good intentions faster than being inconsistent. .... One family member doesn't allow the cat on the dining table [the child to play at the table], but then another will. .... It's not fair to send mixed messages to your cat [child] and then get mad when [he or] she doesn't seem to respond to your training [teaching] requests. Make sure all family members are on the same page when it comes to training the cat [teaching your child]. Well... DUH! |
| As a new volunteer at the bookstore that raises funds in support of our libraries, I learn a lot. I learn really cool things and I learn things I'd as soon not know. How did I get here? As it happens, they needed someone to take on the section of warehouse shelving that is in my field. I have a yellowing degree in Home Economics -- Child and Family Development, and the prospect of spending a few hours a week sorting books was appealing. Those hours are rewarding without being a major drain on emotional or psychic energy. Plus, they provide snacks. Perfect. It's not all cookies and literate people, however, although both are present. Now and then it's a wake-up call. I recently learned that in the front area of the book store (the place that's normally open to the public, where all the best books are sold for ridiculously low prices) the parents who buy books about parenthood don't want anything more than a year old. My reaction? "But Penelope Leach is the greatest resource ever!" As soon as I'd said that, I realized my mother might have said the same thing about Dr. Spock. Yes, sorry to say, I was a "Spock Baby". My daughter was a "Leach Baby", a major step up according to pretty much everyone in the know about such things. So, who do today's new parents follow? I'm not clear about whether there's any one stand-out author answering the questions posed by today's expectant and new parents, but I did learn about one pair of them. Skinny Bitch Bun in the Oven is the title of a book that came to my section the other day. The subtitle? A Gusty Guide to Becoming One Hot (and Healthy) Mother! I turned the book over and read the back. "So you're knocked up, huh? Congratulations! This is one of the most magical and miraculous times in your life. But that doesn't mean you have a free pass to shovel crap in your mouth all day long! .... So the Bitches are back to tell you what the hell to eat through all nine months and beyond." The chapter headings include "Carbs: Eat 'Em, Dumb-Ass" and "What the Hell to Eat". The authors, Rory Freeman and Kim Barnouin, are pictured on the back, looking like normal, civilized people. They are educated people. Even so, we are informed that "Both Bitches live in Los Angeles." Charming. From perusing the book, I find no fault with their facts or their priorities when it comes to maternal care and nutrition. It's their language that's off-putting to me. I get that they are catering to a specific audience -- one that might not pick up a book that doesn't include raunchy language in every second sentence. Maybe they're doing the next generation a great favor by educating their mothers about their bodies and the importance of balance and of avoiding toxic habits. But does this mean my grandchildren will be "Bitches Babies"? We live in raunchy times. The 1920s scandalized previous generations with behavior that inspired a musical and its title song, "Anything Goes". In olden days a glimpse of stocking But the truth is that even in the 20s, not everything went. There were still things that were left unsaid. There were standards. There were parameters. In 2011, it seems the only distinct parameters have to do with murder, incest, and cannibalism. Apart from those things, anything, it seems, goes. Nothing is private, nothing is indecent, and nothing is in place to discourage people from bleeping their way through any and every conversation. In my quaint little world, to punctuate one's sentences with profanity is to expose one's ignorance. If educated people can build an empire based on liberal use of bleepage, what hope is there for the future? Despair though I might, (and I do despair), what is painfully clear to me is that this is not my world anymore. The next generation is coming into their own while my generation is retiring to book sorting and snacking. The world is theirs to make or break, and I pray they do a better job than we did. If language is an indicator, though, our grandchildren face harsh times, indeed. |
| Words aren't usually difficult for me, but a recent experience seems to defy description with words. I'm not sure how to tell this story without sounding coo-coo. Perhaps a little background to start.... My dad died of cancer in 1981; thirty years ago come October. He was fifty-six years young, and we all felt royally cheated by a universe that would cut a remarkable life so short. A source of comfort for me through the decades has been what I call "visits" from Dad. He shows up in dreams and we talk about things that matter and we share a cry -- (something we did only once in life, on his death bed). Sometimes we share a laugh. Sometimes he teaches me something new, or affirms something I've learned. He appears in random stages of life in these dreams -- sometimes middle aged and healthy, sometimes middle aged and dying, and sometimes quite elderly and preparing for his second departure. This is profound stuff, and it nourishes a part of me that misses him terribly. That's probably why I was feeling a bit lost when, on the six month anniversary of my mom's death I hadn't dreamed about her at all. I couldn't shake the look of her in her final days, and it hurt not to be able to call her healthy face to my mind without a lot of effort. I blogged about it on February 22, and since then my brother has shared with me that he's been in the same condition. There was something about writing that blog that unlocked something inside of me, though, because within a month afterward I was dreaming about Mom, too. Sometimes she was middle-aged, sometimes she was old, sometimes healthy, sometimes sickly, sometimes she and Dad "visited" together, sometimes not, and most often Mom appeared as about my current age -- middle-aged and graying, but healthy and vital. Then, a few weeks ago, I had a dream that was different from all the others, and it had a profound impact. When I described it to my brother and said I wanted to blog about it he wished me luck in translating it into a blog. Well, here goes: I'm elderly and I'm on my deathbed. My daughter is there, middle-aged and holding my hand. We're talking about my imminent demise, about my lack of fear, about my love for her, and then I see my mother standing beside my daughter. I say, "Mommy?" My daughter looks confused and I explain, "I see my mommy. She's right beside you. She's going to show me the way." But Mom appeared to be in her twenties and she was radiant. She literally glowed with -- what? -- happiness? No, it was beyond happiness. It was joy. Besides that, she was beautiful. Her familiar pale blue eyes shone with a light I'd never seen in them before. Her skin was perfect -- a peaches and cream complexion. She looked stunning, and without so much as the lipstick she always (always!) wore in life. My brother didn't need the explanation I'm going to give you, dear reader. He knew Mom, and he knew we'd never seen her radiant and he knew she'd been denied physical beauty in life. This was an extraordinary vision. I told him I had the sense that I was seeing our mom the way God (or whatever) has always seen her. Within these fragile clay suits we wear reside pure beings -- pure spirits -- and I believe that is what I was allowed to see in that dream. Mom is not gone. She is with us on some level all the time. We came from her and she is part of us. She is free now, though. She's free of fickle flesh, of life's dramas and traumas and the evidence they leave upon us. She's free of disease, of dementia, and she's even free of the possessions humans drag around from place to place and try to keep track of. She's free and happy and existing in life's purest form: spirit. And she will continue to exist for us as long as we remember her and talk about her and continue to do the things we loved to do when we did them with her. I will always remember what it was like in those final days of Mom's life, just as I remember the same about Dad's, but now that isn't the image of her that predominates. It's one among many, and now I also have that radiant image of her from beyond to hold in my heart. Somehow it closes the circle for me. Preachers speak of "ashes to ashes, dust to dust", but I think if they really understand what comes after this life they should also speak of "light to light, joy to joy, purity to purity". Mom's ashes, Mom's dust, sits in a container in my house, but she is not there. She is free. And I am freer now, too. Thanks for visiting, Mom. |